All articles by Tony Bingham – Page 18

  • Comment

    Murphy’s law in action

    2004-07-16T00:00:00Z

    What do you do if you find that life on site cruelly punctures the naive hopes in your tender? Well, you try to get the client to pay more, don’t you? Yes, but how?

  • Comment

    Capper's way

    2004-07-09T00:00:00Z

    Professor Philip Capper has just made a super speech about adjudication, about judges, about lawyers … and especially about his girlfriend Iris

  • Comment

    Just blow the whistle

    2004-07-02T00:00:00Z

    It is very important that referees bear one simple rule in mind: when organising a contest between two teams, you're not allowed to kick the ball yourself

  • Comment

    Legal aliens

    2004-06-25T00:00:00Z

    The little green men from Euroland love to stamp on anything the British are good at, such as the PFI – although 'competitive dialogue' may mark a lighter touch

  • Comment

    Demons and angels

    2004-06-18T00:00:00Z

    Claims mongerers are chasing ambulances in every walk of life. But adjudication shrived them of their sins in construction, and could be the answer elsewhere

  • Comment

    The nature of the beast

    2004-06-11T00:00:00Z

    It may surprise you to learn that lawyers and academics are still not entirely sure what an adjudicator is, what they can do, and what they are like

  • Comment

    Miss Mediation

    2004-06-04T00:00:00Z

    Is it ever permissable to bypass mediation and go straight to court? The answer is yes. A useful guide as to when emerged out of a recent appeal court case

  • Comment

    Step right in

    2004-05-28T00:00:00Z

    By not taking extra time to decide the case, an adjudicator led the parties straight to the courtroom door – where they were greeted by a welcoming judge

  • Comment

    Up the workers

    2004-05-21T00:00:00Z

    This is another everyday story of self-employment and rights and conditions at work. Redrow thought it had a contract and that was it. Wrong, wrong wrong!

  • Comment

    Picking the ponies

    2004-05-14T00:00:00Z

    The people who hire adjudicators want intelligent, nimble beasts that cover the ground at a gallop while safely leaping legal hurdles. But how can they get them?

  • Comment

    Hold up!

    2004-05-07T00:00:00Z

    The adjudicator thought he had spotted an ambush. But by heading the highwaymen off at the pass, he robbed them of their chance to defend themselves

  • Comment

    Blood and treasure

    2004-04-30T00:00:00Z

    Firms who took part in the foot-and-mouth massacre were treated like pirates when they presented their bill. This is how they eventually got their gold

  • Comment

    Innocence and experience

    2004-04-16T00:00:00Z

    If an adjudicator sees something they shouldn't, is there any way that they can escape a charge of bias? Here's how one adjudicator tackled the problem

  • Comment

    Leave the act alone

    2004-04-08T00:00:00Z

    The plan, announced in the Budget, to set up the CIPER forum is deeply troubling. It will be a kind of secret society, and it will want to change the Construction Act

  • Comment

    Man bites dog

    2004-04-02T00:00:00Z

    With the scent of unpaid levy in its nostrils, the CITB can be a bit of a rottweiler. Perhaps it needs to change its image and pay more attention to its product?

  • Comment

    Pinned and needled

    2004-03-26T00:00:00Z

    A client's attempts to wriggle out of adjudication on three tricky points of law were quashed by one very clever adjudicator – and he wasn't even a lawyer

  • Comment

    Get Shorty

    2004-03-19T00:00:00Z

    Disciplinary boards often resemble something between a kangaroo court and a lynch mob – as a former cabinet minister may be about to discover

  • Comment

    A misjudgment

    2004-03-12T00:00:00Z

    The parties in Tally Wiejl vs Pegram became utterly confused by the problem of which contract was in place. Now this question has foxed the Court of Appeal, too

  • Comment

    A salty tale

    2004-03-05T00:00:00Z

    If two parties to a dispute give different accounts of what happened, courts look for something on paper. Trouble is, documents can be too persuasive

  • Comment

    The silent service

    2004-02-20T00:00:00Z

    Adjudicators aren't private eyes – or inquiry judges – looking into every detail of a case. They're paid just to assess the arguments … then keep their mouths shut