Energy consumption levels reflect the standard of life enjoyed by the consumers. Politically, pressure to reduce energy consumption would prove unpopular, both by the affluent energy profligate nations, and developing nations looking to 'fuel' their economies. Any move to reduce energy consumption will therefore need strong drivers. Thirty years ago the fuel crisis provided a driver. Over the last decade increasing concern over the impact that escalating energy consumption has on our environment has resulted in a new and powerful driver. It has attracted significant international concern, with a strong call to reduce our carbon dioxide emissions. This will essentially require a reduction in energy consumption, or finding ways of producing energy without burning fossil fuels.
Scientific opinion that the burning of fossil fuels is responsible for global warming is now almost unanimous. Given the predicted impact of global warming on our weather systems and ecology any measures to mitigate the effects must be fully considered including:
- reducing the consumption of fossil fuels;
- increased use of renewable resources – both in terms of energy and materials;
- avoidance of waste/maximise use of recyclable materials;
- increased flexibility of use.
All of which can be influenced by building services engineers.
Reducing fossil fuel consumption
Buildings are responsible for over 43% of the EU's energy consumption, and 46% of the UK's CO2 emissions. A vast majority of this is energy is provided by fossil fuels, with less than 3% provided from renewable resources.
The variety and extent of renewable energy resources is comforting (figure 1). In theory, the UK's total electricity demand could be met by wind turbines alone (see table 1 for current installed capacity). In practice this is unlikely, and a mixed basket of resources is the most practical proposition. In terms of total energy we only need to harness 1·4% of the solar power falling on the UK to meet energy demands.
This presents many practical challenges, but illustrates the overall potential renewable resources present. Direct conversion of solar energy to electricity using photovoltaic (pv) cells is a proven technology. However, with an output of 140 kWh/m2 per annum and a capital cost around £500/m2 other investments in C02 reducing technology such as passive solar designs reap better rewards, unless the pv arrays form a fully functional part of the building facade. By use of regulations we are improving the levels of thermal insulation in our buildings. As a result of increased insulation standards, energy needed to heat the ventilation air has become a more significant component of total building heat loss. Regardless of whether the space is mechanically ventilated or naturally ventilated, in winter ventilation air has to be heated to an appropriate temperature. If we look at the power required to heat 8 l/s of ventilation air, (minimum fresh air rate per person) using a typical UK winter design temperature of -3°C the load equates to approximately 230 W (table 2). If the same volume of air is heated via a mechanical ventilation system the fan power has to be added. Using a typical ventilation plant this would add a further 3 W per l/s of air moved equating to an additional 24 W to the 230 W required. However, at least 16 W of this will be converted into useful heat gain. If a heat recovery system with an efficiency of 75% is incorporated into the mechanical system this could reduce the power consumed by the system to around 90 W.
This clearly demonstrates the improved efficiency of using mechanical ventilation with heat recovery over natural ventilation in terms of energy, cost and reducing CO2 emissions. Simply put in financial terms the above example equates to some £10 per person per annum. When compared with an average salary of £15 000 per annum it is easy to see why investors see greater potential by investing in improved staff performance. It is essential that we understand the impact that increased comfort level has on human performance. Data to demonstrate the generalised effect is available but not properly accepted.
If precise data were available, that demonstrated that a given increase in comfort improved human performance by a quantifiable degree, the engineer would have a powerful analysis tool. And providing more for less is at the heart of sustainability.
Legislative pressures
A number of legislative instruments have recently been introduced to reinforce the need to reduce energy consumption and promote the reduction in CO2 emissions. The UK government's Energy White Paper acknowledges that climate change is real and that positive action is needed to mitigate the impact. Beyond the altruistic ambitions to reduce emissions the White Paper acknowledges that the UK will soon become a net importer of gas and oil with a corresponding potential threat to energy security. The main aims of the White Paper are a 60% cut in the UK's CO2 emissions by 2050 and eliminating fuel poverty by 2018, while promoting a competitive energy market and reliable energy supplies. It sets out a strategy for the next 20 years and aims for the following 30 years. Critics claim that it lacks hard-edged targets. It also unfairly places too much emphasis on electricity production, while being light on measures to reduce heat and transport energy consumption. Many also question the Paper's assertion that the targets can be achieved at a cost of less than 2% of gdp. To achieve the reductions the White Paper promotes the use of more renewables, distributed generation, combined heat and power (chp) installations, fuel cells and the improvement of net metering arrangements (selling locally generated power back to the grid).
One of the few legislative documents referred to in the White Paper is the Building Regulations. In 2002 Approved Document Part L (Part J in Scotland) introduced new standards in energy efficiency in England and Wales. Many believed that this did not go far enough. The White Paper signals the intent to bring forward the next revision of Part L to 2005. Pre-dating the White Paper by a month, the European Parliament directive 2002/91/EC on the energy performance in buildings came into force, requiring that member states have legislation in place by 4 January 2006. The impact of this legislation is likely to attract considerable attention, given that it will require the inspection and certification of some 160 million buildings throughout the EU. The Directive is simply and clearly written and aims to improve the energy performance of buildings by the processes of assessment, labelling and regular inspection. To be successful considerable intellectual effort will need to be expended to convert the simply stated aspirations of the Directive into bullet-proof national legislation. Whatever the detail, this will place considerable additional work on the building services sector.
Operation and maintenance
Most building services engineers experienced in energy auditing will appreciate the significant potential that exists for reducing energy consumption in buildings. Savings of 10%, and arguably much more, could be achieved by good housekeeping measures and ensuring a watchful eye is kept on operating procedures and routines. Much more could be done to minimise energy consumption by:
- improved control strategies;
- better commissioning;
- maintenance staff who understand how the systems are supposed to work;
- regular monitoring and reviewing of system performance;
- identification of poorly set up control systems.
The ability of a building management system to highlight poorly performing plant, by techniques such as expert systems, has been with us for 15 years or so – but we rarely if ever use them. One key area where we could make considerable reductions in energy consumption is in buildings where the occupancy rate varies, such as auditoria, museums, sports arenas and lecture theatres. To do so effectively requires a sensing device that will properly monitor the air conditions to control the fresh air supply. Experience has shown that indoor air quality sensors have a very limited response to all but heavy pollutants. While CO2 sensors provide better performance, they are not sufficiently robust for general use without regular re-calibration. A considerable reward awaits the inventor of a truly effective and robust air quality sensor. For many years the standard of commissioning employed on building services installations has been criticised. With the Part L requirements and other impending legislation, greater emphasis will be placed on more robust commissioning procedures, as the systems are more likely to come under closer scrutiny post completion.
Sustainable solutions
In the past five years sustainable design has gone from a fringe interest to a desirable attribute. In the next five years it will become an essential part of the design and operation of our buildings. Building services engineers will have a key role in achieving these aims by delivering appropriate, well informed and balanced advice to our clients and building operators. To do so we must make sure that we properly equip and train our engineers so that they are able to produce practical and inventive sustainable environmental solutions for any particular set of circumstances. We will also need to play a key role in advising and informing government agencies so that they construct clear, consistent and workable guidance in delivering new legislative structures.
Further reading
Energy White Paper: www.dti.gov.uk/energy/whitepaper/index.shtmEuropean directive on the energy performance of buildings: www.europa.eu.int/eurlex/pri/en/oj/dat/2003/l_001/l_00120030104en00650071.pdf
The impacts of climate change: www.defra.gov.uk/environment/climatechange.
ASHRAE – Energy position paper: www.ashrae.com
International Energy Outlook 2003: www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/ieo/index.html
Downloads
Source
Building Sustainable Design
Postscript
Terry Dix, BSc CEng FIMechE FCIBSE MIHEEM is a director of Arup
No comments yet