More news – Page 4011
-
Comment
Who’s in control?
The defendant contractor secured a contract to decorate the exterior of a building. The claimant was a painter and decorator in partnership with his father and they were instructed by the defendant to carry out the work. The work required the use of scaffolding, but no ladder was provided by ...
-
NewsWork begins on 190m Cambridge PFI hospital
Alfred McAlpine and partner Haden Young has started on a two-year project at Addenbrookes hospital.
-
NewsHewitt plans to crack industry's men only culture
Trade secretary launches campaign to persuade more women to break into ‘macho’ world of construction.
-
News
Galliford Try directors resign to set up niche business
Affordable housing bosses John Owen and David Faint expected to launch construction consultancy.
-
News
Fresh blow to Jarvis as highways boss quits
John Worthington resigns just as firm starts to rely on highways maintenance division to help cut debts.
-
NewsDavid Curry
The angry reaction from the House Builders Federation to PPG3 is predictable, but will John Prescott listen to its argument and reconsider some of his most criticised ideas?
-
FeaturesPresident Clinton
He may not yet be the international political force that Bill once was, but Colin Clinton knows how to use power to effect change – and not just at the ICE. We talk to him about his modernising agenda, globalisation and lawn mowing.
-
CommentWhat goes around …
Here’s a warning to all those clients, and their lawyers, who want to make the granting of extensions conditional on a contractor giving notice about the effects of delay
-
CommentNothing comes of nothing
Contractors are forever complaining about disruption on the job, but without hard evidence an adjudicator will award them precisely zero compensation
-
Comment
Is it worth it?
In recent issues of Building, the alarm has been raised about the increasing cost of going to adjudication. Now we want you to help us find out the facts
-
CommentIt’s bad news, I’m afraid
Project managers and clients beware: under certain circumstances, you may fall under the Inland Revenue’s CIS scheme – with unpleasant consequences
-
Comment
Why we said what we said
In your leader “Rouse … to Simmons” (15 October, page 3), CABE’s views of the proposals for the Royal London Hospital are criticised as “ill-judged” and “ill-timed”.
-
Comment
Slums for the future
I wonder how many of your readers spotted that the balconies at Barons Place (8 October, page 39) have been installed upside down.
-
Comment
Tweaking the act
I have just read Tony Bingham’s article in this week’s Building (8 October, page 54). I am aghast at the indecision of review panel number one – the looking at changes to the Construction Act’s payment rules – which surely must have the sense to recognise injustice and abuse when ...
-
Comment
The wrong kind of demand
Nick Lane is right to sound a warning about using winding-up petitions to make debtors cough up (3 September, page 52).
-
Comment
Be a record maker
I read with interest the excellent article entitled “Dear site diary” by Andrew Farrer (8 October, page 34).
-
Comment
A site issue
Imposing stricter safety regulations on the architect will not make construction safer as they are too far removed from the front line of construction (1 October, page 15).
-
Comment
Miscalculation
In the commentary accompanying your top 200 consultants feature (1 October, page 45), you say FaberMaunsell has 16,000 staff following acquisition of Oscar Faber in 2001.
-
CommentOpen mike: Against CABE
CABE’s apparently enlightened opinion that architecture is a force for social good conceals a totalitarian approach to human nature. Luckily, however, it’s wrong