More news – Page 3641

  • News

    2012 Olympic panel listens to final presentations

    2006-08-04T00:00:00Z

    An Olympic Delivery Authority panel this week heard the final presentations from teams bidding to clinch the delivery partner role for the 2012 Olympics.

  • Comment

    A right to know

    2006-08-04T00:00:00Z

    The first defendant, Alldown was engaged to carry out certain demolition and excavation works for the claimant, Shinedean’s premises. The excavation works caused the wall of an adjoining property to collapse. Alldown notified its Insurer, AXA of the collapsed wall in September 2002. Shinedean paid the owner of the ...

  • HSE
    News

    HSE: Poor health more prevalent in construction

    2006-08-04T14:20:00Z

    Statistics published today by the Health and Safety Executive reveal higher rates of work-related ill health than the all-industry average

  • Olympic bridge
    News

    ODA sets out sustainability agenda for Olympic park

    2006-08-04T13:50:00Z

    Delivery body publishes 12 objectives based on the themes of climate change, waste, biodiversity, inclusion and healthy living

  • Morrison
    News

    AWG to sell Morrison support services arm

    2006-08-04T09:05:00Z

    Source says that AWG will demerge Morrison's facility and utility businesses and sell them off as separate entities

  • Tony Bingham
    Comment

    Blood on the tracks

    2006-08-04T00:00:00Z

    Last year the criminal court fined Balfour Beatty £10m after it pleaded guilty to its part in the Hatfield rail disaster. Then last month the Court of Appeal lopped £2.5m off the penalty. Here’s why …

  • News

    AWG to sell Morrison support services arm

    2006-08-04T00:00:00Z

    Utilities company AWG is set to sell subsidiary Morrison’s £600m-turnover support services division.

  • News

    AJC Contractors vs Harris Calnan Construction

    2006-08-04T00:00:00Z

    AJC asks the High Court to enforce the adjudicator’s decision

  • News

    Entwistle: ‘Jarvis not to blame for Potters Bar’

    2006-08-04T09:13:00Z

    Richard Entwistle responds to Court of Appeal judge’s decision not launch a public inquiry

  • 99% campaign
    News

    Property directors get behind 99% Campaign

    2006-08-04T08:59:00Z

    Survey by Gensler presents business case for refurbishment of existing stock

  • News

    Read it and weep

    2006-08-04T08:00:00Z

    Building’s departing chief sub-editor, Jo Connolly gets a few things off her chest

  • McEwan: Rejected bid from SKM last month
    News

    Currie & Brown sacked three defecting directors

    2006-08-04T00:00:00Z

    Trio dismissed after employer discovered they were planning to move to Sinclair Knight Mertz

  • News

    Report slams academy designs

    2006-08-04T00:00:00Z

    A government-backed report has claimed that the design and construction of city academies remain a serious problem.

  • 99% campaign
    News

    Property directors get behind 99% Campaign

    2006-08-04T00:00:00Z

    Survey by Gensler presents business case for refurbishment of existing stock

  • The flagship Manhattan store of handbag maker Longchamp boasts a three-storey cascading staircase designed by Thomas Heatherwick and made from 55 tonnes of steel. The engineer was Packman Lucas
    Features

    Specialist costs: Retail fit-out

    2006-08-04T00:00:00Z

    Retail fit-out offers repeated high volumes of work as well as high-end one-off projects. Neal Kalita of Davis Langdon outlines the particular demands of high street fit-outs, details the procurement and project management issues and breaks down the refurbishment costs

  • Comment

    Power struggle

    2006-08-04T00:00:00Z

    The energy review argues for a ‘streamlined’ planning process for nuclear power stations. But blocking opposition at the inquiry stage may simply antagonise residents and campaigners who feel sidelined …

  • Comment

    Think before you rethink

    2006-08-04T00:00:00Z

    When will we ever learn? Crossrail experts have rejected station designs (after a four-month assessment) because one was “not providing enough scope for further redevelopment” and another was “architecturally undistinguished”. As these criteria are so important, why were they (presumably) not part of the original brief? Could it be that ...

  • Comment

    A cross rail architect

    2006-08-04T00:00:00Z

    I read your article concerning Crossrail designs (21 July) and I cannot reconcile your comments with the statements in the design review to which you refer.

  • Comment

    In workers own hands

    2006-08-04T00:00:00Z

    Your article “We’ve got your workers” (14 July) misrepresents the greater number of labour providers in the construction sector.