Investment in the south, low demand in the north – does the East Midlands' tricky housing market remind you of anything? Mark Beveridge reports on how the region is managing the balance from its former coalfields to the borders of Milton Keynes
"I'll bet you right now that we'll never see a regional assembly in the East Midlands. That would require somebody to be thinking regionally, and at the moment nobody is." According to Andrew Malone, chief executive of Nottingham Community Housing Association, one of the East Midlands' largest registered social landlords, all is not well in the region.

The East Midlands, he says, faces an important choice: should it embrace the government's drive for growth or concentrate on regenerating deprived areas? The Communities Plan gave a bundle of cash to the part of the East Midlands that falls into the Milton Keynes housing growth area, underlining the problem of a region that displays the dysfunctions of the UK housing market in microcosm: how to reconcile low demand in its northern counties with growing demand in its south.

Malone fears a compromise will be impossible despite the regional housing board's intentions to accommodate both issues. Growth, he believes, will trump regeneration, leaving some of the region's most established RSLs out in the cold.

Nothing on paper hints at the tensions at play beneath the region's surface. The East Midlands has a relatively small population (see "The stats", above) and no big cities: its three biggest conurbations are Nottingham, Derby and Leicester – all cities, but medium sized. Unemployment is below average, house prices are comparatively low. In the north and east, the region is predominantly rural. To the south, towns such as Northampton, Corby and Kettering are within touching distance of Milton Keynes, and fall into the growth area.

The regional housing strategy is due to be agreed in April and recognises the need for regeneration and growth. But a glance at the regional housing board's provisional plans seems to bear out Malone's fear that development has the upper hand: almost 40% of the £133m affordable housing X programme for 2004-6 will go to the East Midlands' southern areas – that's a mere eight of the region's 42 local authorities.

If you look at the Communities Plan it’s clear there is a series of priorities, most linked to dealing with the burden anticipated around London 

David Seviour, chief executive, Leicester Housing Association

Then there's the funding to improve infrastructure in the south: not three weeks ago, £35m was allocated to the Milton Keynes/South Midlands growth area, with £10.6m going to Wellingborough, in Northamptonshire, to pave the way for 3400 homes to be built. This cash will draw attention southwards; low-demand northern areas fear they will lose out as a result.

David Seviour, chief executive of Leicester Housing Association, says: "The Communities Plan sets out a number of objectives, but if you look at the resource table at the back of the plan it's quite clear that there is a series of particular priorities – most linked to dealing with the burden anticipated around London." He points out that the region's former Coalfields area, to the north of Nottingham, has been allocated little more than £12m toward the replacement of blighted housing with new homes.

Rather than pursue development, Leicester Housing Association has chosen to concentrate on improving its stock in the north and on challenging regeneration projects such as Braunstone in Leicester. The association has already invested £14m in some of the mining villages that failed to recover from the decline of the coal industry in the 1980s (see "The three cities", below).

Seviour's concern is shared by his colleague Gary Kirk, who has been seconded from Leicester Housing Association to be director of regeneration at a body set up to lead the rehabilitation of an area of the North Derbyshire coalfields (See "How green is my Meden Valley?" below). Kirk says: "The danger is if there isn't a strong regional strategy statement and funds, the south is going to grab all the resources. And the big issue is the north-south divide and what money there is left over for regeneration."

The East Midlands is set to become a region where established RSLs will be forced to work together

Harry Perry, chief executive, Leicester Newarke Housing Association

Unlike Leicester, Nottingham Community Housing Association has opted to pursue growth. It has run an £8m-plus building programme for several years and because of this development record, chief executive Andrew Malone says he expects Nottingham Community to be selected as one of the Housing Corporation's preferred partners.

This means it will be "pushed to where the money is". Such is the pull of the southern growth area that Nottingham Community, for the moment, no longer has any plans to develop in its home area around Nottingham.

The only other East Midlands association likely to be made a preferred partner is Longhurst Group, which owns homes across the region. Many of the homes planned for the southern growth area will have to be built by associations from outside the region.

For those RSLs that were regional middleweights – East Midlands Housing Association, Leicester Newarke Housing Association – the future doesn't seem so bright. Harry Perry, chief executive of the latter, says: "There are only one or two RSLs that have the regular year-on-year clout. Most are not large enough. The East Midlands is set to become a region where several established associations will be forced to work together to deliver the economies of scale required."

For Rosemarie Anderson, chief executive of Rockingham Forest Housing Association, a small RSL based in East Northamptonshire, the challenge will be convincing large developers to get involved in small rural schemes and then allow local RSLs to manage the homes built. "We're at risk of losing good management," she says. "An aggressive developer can't necessarily add value to a community."

East Midlands: the stats

  • Population: 4.2 million, projected to reach 4.31 million by 2006; 37% of region’s population live in rural areas. The rural population is set to grow by 12% between 1996 and 2021
  • Unemployment: 4.2%; that’s lower than the national average of 5.0%
  • 1.795 million homes of which 73% are owner-occupied, 13% are for local authority rent, 9% are privately rented, and 5% rented through RSLs
  • Average price of a home in second quarter 2003: £120,759, an 87% increase over five years
  • Households receiving benefits: 69% – the same as the national average
  • Vandalism, burglary and vehicle theft per year: 3093 per 10,000 households; national average 3664 per 10,000 households
  • How green is my Meden Valley?

    The story of Derbyshire’s Meden Valley is a classic study in decline. Around 30 villages spread over 53 square miles of otherwise rural land, all more or less dependent on coal; then, over a 12-year period beginning in the mid-1980s, the area loses 7000 colliery jobs. Social decline follows. British Coal, the largest landlord in the area, begins selling off its homes at a huge discount. Some families buy their homes but the sell-off also brings in a large number of private landlords. “The area has been in a spiral of decline ever since and it’s been compounded by the rural isolation of the villages and their lack of amenities,” says Janet Bradbury, chief executive of Meden Valley Making Places, a regeneration body recently formed to help rebuild local communities. Following the lead of Leicester Housing Association, which first bought homes in the area in 1988 and has since acquired almost 1000, Meden Valley Making Places is now working across 11 villages. It aims to buy up existing homes, refurbish some and demolish and replace others. Backed by Mansfield and Bolsover district councils, the East Midlands Development Agency and English Partnerships, Making Places has roughly £14m to invest in a total of 1000 homes. But it faces a substantial problem: Bolsover and Mansfield come 30th and 37th respectively in the list of the most deprived local authorities in England. Part of the strategy for regeneration involves “village companies”, pioneered with initial support from Leicester Housing Association. These allow villagers to buy a stake in their village, and give them a say in creating an economic plan. In one village, Whaley Thorns, the village company has set up a print shop and a community resource centre and hopes to open a chip shop soon. “When I moved here, the village couldn’t have been any worse. At least now there’s a reason to have some hope,” says Linda Harwood, a resident who works as an administrator for the village company. David Seviour, chief executive of Leicester Housing Association, adds: “Small progress of this kind can be tremendously important for the life of these small communities.”

    The three Cities: life without transfer

    It’s a peculiarity of the East Midlands that stock transfer has been considerably less popular there than in the rest of the country. Almost a third of all local authority housing would have failed the decent homes standard in April 2003, 17 authorities are thought to be at risk of falling short by 2010 and the repair backlog has been estimated at £400m. Yet none of the region’s three main cities has shown any inclination to transfer. “It’s not so much strong opposition to stock transfer, more a question of tenants preferring the devil they know,” says Lynne Pennington, director of housing at Nottingham council. “The council has done a lot of work on security and improving neighbourhoods, and I think the tenants appreciate that.” Nottingham council estimates that it needs roughly £175m to meet the decent homes target in its 34,000 homes. Last year, the council bid to set up a fourth-round arm’s-length management organisation, following in the footsteps of near neighbours Derby and Ashfield, which were among the first councils in the country to set up ALMOs. But unlike Derby, Nottingham’s repairs and maintenance service has only one star at present. As well as getting the required two stars for its whole housing service, the ALMO will have to win the support of tenants, which will not be taken for granted in the light of Camden’s “no” vote. Bassetlaw in Nottinghamshire is also hoping to join the ALMO fourth round. It needs an estimated £65m to meet the decent homes target. Meanwhile Derby Homes, the city’s ALMO, is waiting to find out whether the government will agree to its appeal for an extra £32m. Unless it receives funding at a level comparable with second- and third-round ALMOs, Derby Homes could have difficulty meeting the decent homes target and completing its planned redevelopment projects. Leicester, another three-star housing service, has transferred small parcels of its stock, most notably on the Braunstone estate, where Leicester Housing Association took on 220 homes for a nominal fee. The council has yet to decide what to do with its remaining homes. Elsewhere in the city, Leicester’s regeneration company, which is hoping to attract private developers into parts of the town centre, has abandoned its opposition to new social housing, and agreed to promote up to 30% affordable housing on new schemes.

    Crowded country: rural issues

    House prices in the East Midlands have increased by 87% in the five years to mid-2003 – 13 percentage points more than the national average. The impact of this rise has been felt most keenly in rural areas, which contain 37% of the region’s population. An influx of retirees and second-home owners has exacerbated the lack of affordable housing for local people. “Roughly £22m has been allocated to build 464 rural houses between 2004-2006 and we’re confident of meeting that,” says Ian White, head of the housing team at the Government Office for the East Midlands. But development on this small a scale is unlikely to solve the problem. The rural economy has brought both legal and illegal immigrants to the region, many of whom live in overcrowded private housing. East Lindsey council has taken a more proactive approach by transferring its stock to Linx Homes in 1999. The pair now work together to find rural sites and improve rural infrastructure. Since 1999 the council has, in association with RSLs and the Housing Corporation, helped build roughly 400 affordable homes.

    Due South: the lucky area

    Milton Keynes, which is not itself in the East Midlands, is the hub for the government’s most northerly growth area, but almost half of the planned homes are to be built in the East Midlands. Government-commissioned research concluded that Northamptonshire could absorb up to 45% of the area’s potential growth in the area over the next 30 years. Around the urban centres of Corby, Kettering and Wellingborough, this should mean almost 50,000 extra homes by 2021. A year on from the Communities Plan – which resulted in £36m being earmarked for growth in Northamptonshire – an urban regeneration company is up and running in Corby, seeking to ensure that up to 60% of new development is on brownfield sites. Following a visit by regeneration minister Lord Rooker in mid-January, an urban development corporation in West Northampton now seems likely, and the area is set to gain a further £23m. That’s still about £20m less than the regional housing board has been calling for, though: its appeal for extra cash during 2004-6 to fund affordable housing and infrastructure projects has been rejected by government. David Alderman, head of planning and regeneration at Northampton borough council, says: “There are still many uncertainties about the precise nature and role of the UDC and much will depend upon how positively local communities can engage with it.”

    Who’s who

    Jane Todd, regional director of the Government Office of the East Midlands and chair of the Regional Housing Board
    Previously the director of development and environmental services at Nottingham Council, where she co-ordinated major regeneration projects in the city’s Lace Market quarter. Joined Nottingham city council in 1985 and helped develop many for the city’s black and minority ethnic centres – the Indian Centre, Hindu Temple, Marcus Garvey and Pakistan Centre. Andrew Malone, chief executive of Nottingham Community Housing Association
    One-time teacher in inner-city Birmingham turned long serving head of one of the East Midland’s largest housing associations. Has been at Nottingham Community for more than 30 years. Interested in jazz, foreign travel, Samuel Beckett and James Joyce. David Seviour, chief executive of Leicester Housing Association
    Sevious was Leicester HA’s first employee back in 1977. Helped to lead a successful 10-year battle to lift a government embargo that prevented aid being granted to improve ex-British Coal properties in north Nottinghamshire and north-east Derbyshire. A published author, he has a interest in pre-medieval history. Lynne Pennington, director of Housing Nottingham City Council
    Has worked in housing since 1975, working with the first Liverpool Housing Trust and Leeds council. Now aims to convert Nottingham’s housing service from one star to an excellent three. Mike Forrester, Leicester City Council’s director of housing.
    Has been in the job for nine years and before that, was the council’s chief financial officer. Gained national recognition when the council’s housing maintenance service became the first in the country to be awarded three stars and beacon status for improving housing maintenance (2000/1) and for tackling homelessness (2003/4).