All Letters articles – Page 94

  • Comment

    Get ’em young

    2005-01-07T00:00:00Z

    Andrew Williams’ article “The QS’ apprentice” (19 November, page 33) raises some interesting issues about how we train future practitioners, and will no doubt provoke much debate.

  • Comment

    The price of CSCS

    2005-01-07T00:00:00Z

    I read with amazement that the CSCS scheme is £5m in the red (3 December, page 9).

  • Comment

    Mr BTEC responds

    2005-01-07T00:00:00Z

    As a course director (“Mr BTEC”) at the College of West Anglia in Norfolk, I would like to reassure readers that Della Madgwick’s unfortunate experience, recounted in her letter of 3 December, need not be universal.

  • Comment

    The name’s Bond … retention bond

    2005-01-07T00:00:00Z

    A number of British Constructional Steelwork Association members may choose to give bonds in place of accepting cash retention (26 November, page 63), but I hope you don’t think I’m being too pedantic if I remind you that this is no longer a BCSA matter but one for individual companies.

  • Comment

    Jack’s blunder

    2005-01-07T00:00:00Z

    Jack Pringle’s comments (3 December, page 34) demonstrate how out of touch with reality the RIBA remains in 2004, with its obsession for style before function.

  • Comment

    All in the forecast

    2005-01-07T00:00:00Z

    Further to Malcolm Taylor’s letter (10 December, page 29), it may well be puzzling that the services element of a building does not receive the same level of prescriptive design as the architectural elements.

  • Comment

    Perfect 10 (well, almost)

    2005-01-07T00:00:00Z

    I was interested to read Rudi Klein’s recent article about the benefits of single project insurance to the construction industry (26 November, page 51).

  • What was going on there then?
    Comment

    What was going on there then?

    2004-12-10T00:00:00Z

    Two weeks ago, we published this photo from the days when architectural models were hand-carved out of wood and nothing said steely determination quite like a well-appointed pipe. We asked you to provide as much information as you could about what was going on and such was the response that ...

  • Comment

    It’s not either/or

    2004-12-10T00:00:00Z

    The article on “new urbanism” (26 November, page 41) pitted two extreme and opposing views of architects. On the one hand, we are asked to believe that a bunch of icon-obsessed egos is working in the interests of self-promotion rather than for the benefit of our towns and cities; on ...

  • Comment

    CSCS is working

    2004-12-10T00:00:00Z

    As the employers’ side of the CSCS board, Building’s news article on 3 December dismays us (“Unions attack CITB over £5m deficit in CSCS scheme”, page 9). It is worth remembering that the “Qualifying the Workforce” initiative, led by employers with enthusiastic support from the unions, has resulted in more ...

  • Comment

    Chiding Charlie

    2004-12-10T00:00:00Z

    In your article “Whitehall gets a royal warning over fast-track housebuilding” (26 November, page 16), Prince Charles is quoted as saying: “The fast building movement will strangle the world unless we look at diversity above mass production.” Whoever is supplying the prince with information about the design flexibility of homes ...

  • Comment

    House of cards

    2004-12-10T00:00:00Z

    I read with some amusement about the power struggle between CSCS and the CITB (26 November, page 24).The views of John Smith more than adequately reflect the real world. Despite the willingness of many legitimate contractors and specialist contractors to apply the scheme, the whole thing will degenerate into even ...

  • Comment

    Jobs for the boys

    2004-12-10T00:00:00Z

    I always read with interest your articles bemoaning the lack of women in the industry. Like Helen Sanders (26 November, page 36), I don’t always agree with this philosophy.Setting my rather cynical opinion aside and working under the assumption that construction does need more women to help fill the skills ...

  • Comment

    Backing the bill

    2004-12-10T00:00:00Z

    Despite objections from certain camps, government backing for more stringent punishments in order to reduce the level of workplace death and injury (“Queen’s speech heralds corporate manslaughter bill”, 26 November, page 15) is largely matched by the corporate world’s level of concern.

  • Comment

    Costing the ‘black art’

    2004-12-10T00:00:00Z

    Although Chris Haley may well be right in pushing for greater QS involvement in costing services, he misses a vital point (26 November, page 38). A fundamental reason why the costing of services is so poor is that the “trade” traditionally designs a large part of the services elements in ...

  • Comment

    Ahem

    2004-12-10T00:00:00Z

    Regarding the coverage for the official opening of the Wales Millennium Centre (26 November, page 10) I would like to point out that the legend cut out of the main elevation of the building does not read “In these stones horizons sing” in English and Welsh. As an employee of ...

  • Comment

    UK shares Europe’s guilt

    2004-12-03T00:00:00Z

    As reported in Building (19 November, page 15), Alan Wood has exposed the unfair practices that European governments use to exclude British companies from their public sector contracts.

  • Comment

    A BTEC in boredom

    2004-12-03T00:00:00Z

    Having enjoyed a reasonably successful career in construction and having a 16-year-old son with the prospect of 10 good GCSEs and no particular idea what he wants to do, I persuaded him to apply for a BTEC in construction.

  • Comment

    Body talk

    2004-12-03T00:00:00Z

    I’ve just finished reading “The burning of the bodies” (24 September, page 24) and have an overwhelming urge to endorse the idea of an institute for the built environment.

  • Comment

    A tricky treaty

    2004-11-26T00:00:00Z

    Greg Trickey misunderstands the European Union constitution (12 November, page 37), the legal threat of which will be no greater to the UK’s “royal” chartered bodies than to the Crown Prosecution Service, the Royal Mail or indeed the royal family itself.