All Letters articles – Page 93

  • Comment

    Bring out the big guns

    2005-02-04T00:00:00Z

    How excited many of us were when the New Labour government answered our long-held wish and created the Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions, bringing transport and land-use planning together at last and giving the construction industry a single body to talk to. Alas, as Sir Michael Latham ...

  • Comment

    That joke isn’t funny any more

    2005-02-04T00:00:00Z

    Your backward-looking “joke” (21 January, page 29) comparing the rivalry between developers Schroder and Arrowcroft to a drunken brawl and the London Blitz and the, no doubt made-up, comment by a “concerned observer” really is outdated and unsophisticated.

  • Comment

    Lessons from abroad

    2005-02-04T00:00:00Z

    Building is to be congratulated for highlighting the French inroads made over recent years in the UK construction market (21 January, page 38).

  • Comment

    Words of experience

    2005-01-28T00:00:00Z

    Having read your article on aid relief to South-east Asia (14 January, page 15), I would like to draw your attention to my own experiences working in Pakistan and Afghanistan, for several years, in a variety of different organisations.

  • Comment

    Dispelling the myth

    2005-01-28T00:00:00Z

    I have been employed in the construction industry for over 30 years. The majority of this time has been spent in the role of planning and co-ordination and I now spend a proportion of my time involved with time-related disputes.

  • Comment

    Three reasons to go Belgian

    2005-01-28T00:00:00Z

    Mark Jackson’s letter (7 January, page 30) raises a number of interesting points on Rudi Klein’s excellent article on single-project insurance (26 November, page 51). However, his final remark, “Rather than being Belgian, let’s be French!”, would have serious drawbacks.

  • Comment

    Marked men

    2005-01-21T00:00:00Z

    I was interested to read your article on retina eye scans for security purposes at Laing O’Rourke’s construction site at Heathrow Terminal 5.

  • Comment

    Untying a red tape knot

    2005-01-21T00:00:00Z

    It was interesting to see that the red tape featured on your cover last week (7 January, page 32) seems to take the form of the webbing often used to save people from themselves. Isn’t that what most regulation is about?

  • Comment

    Men juggle, too

    2005-01-21T00:00:00Z

    I read your article “How to juggle while balancing” (7 January, page 86) with interest and empathy, but was disappointed and surprised that you chose to take a somewhat outdated “chauvinistic” attitude and present flexible working arrangements as a female-only issue.

  • Comment

    French leave

    2005-01-21T00:00:00Z

    With regard to your article “ODPM losing battle to speed up planning” (10 December, page 10), I refer you to the situation in France.

  • Comment

    Experience (over)valued

    2005-01-21T00:00:00Z

    David Bucknall suggests (14 January, page 36) that if the industry really wants to prove it can learn from its mistakes, it should clamour for teams such as the one which failed so miserably on the Scottish parliament to be appointed on the next major public sector project.

  • Comment

    Data overload

    2005-01-21T00:00:00Z

    I would like to bring your readers’ attention to the fact that the raft of new legislative and regulatory demands is causing construction firms to store massive amounts of data without due regard as to whether they actually need it.

  • Comment

    Brownfield maze

    2005-01-21T00:00:00Z

    I’m a small developer looking to convert an old factory in east London into a block of flats.

  • Comment

    Practical aid appeals

    2005-01-21T00:00:00Z

    A phenomenal amount of support has been given to the regions devastated by the tsunami by the British public in terms of monetary donations.

  • Comment

    You forgot Scotland (again!)

    2005-01-21T00:00:00Z

    You wrote a lot about the the changes to the Building Regulations in England and Wales, but again you fail to mention the Building (Scotland) Act 2003, which alters the building standards system in Scotland from 1 May this year.Sue Bush, building control manager, Inverclyde council

  • Comment

    Not adding up

    2005-01-21T00:00:00Z

    Unusually, I agree totally with Ann Minogue (3 December, page 49).

  • Comment

    Come on, Colin

    2005-01-14T00:00:00Z

    Colin Harding’s jaundiced and outdated view of the modern UK construction industry ignores the tremendous progress made in productivity, innovation and profitability over the past 10 years (17 December, page 21).

  • Comment

    One in the eye for Amicus

    2005-01-14T00:00:00Z

    Despite the concerns of Amicus about the use of retina scans for site security at Heathrow Terminal 5 (17 December, page 9), I can only think that anything that prevents unwanted access to sites is a good thing.

  • Comment

    Alsop’s fables

    2005-01-14T00:00:00Z

    Frivolity, we know, is part of the festive season, but nonetheless it should be no excuse for sloppy journalism.

  • Comment

    Playing by the same rules

    2005-01-07T00:00:00Z

    I read with interest the article on the Glendoe hydroelectric power project in Scotland (3 December, page 10).