All Letters articles – Page 90

  • Comment

    A welcome review

    2005-04-22T00:00:00Z

    All chartered surveyors will be subject to the same conduct and practice requirements, not just QSs. So why the silly headline?

  • Comment

    RICS must offer more support

    2005-04-22T00:00:00Z

    It is evident from the RICS’ business publication that most misconduct issues are not QS-related, and there is no evidence this will change.

  • Comment

    Nothing to do with incompetence

    2005-04-22T00:00:00Z

    I was rather surprised to see the headline “RICS to crack down on incompetent QSs” (8 April, page 14).

  • Comment

    The final word

    2005-04-22T00:00:00Z

    I applaud the RICS’ intention to “take a more active role in policing its members” but I note a degree of hypocrisy in this course of action.

  • Comment

    E-reaction

    2005-04-22T00:00:00Z

    Am I reading your recent article correctly reporting how the Office of Government Commerce is sticking to its strategy for e-auctions in the construction industry (24 March, page 13)? Exactly how does this approach represent best value?

  • Comment

    Bettering the best

    2005-04-22T00:00:00Z

    A seasoned practitioner once told me that “the best thing that ever happened to the construction industry was the Construction Act”. Without question the act has improved matters, but some changes have become desirable.

  • Comment

    Another view

    2005-04-22T00:00:00Z

    My view is that such a step is long overdue.

  • Comment

    Roger Knowles: No discrimination

    2005-04-15T00:00:00Z

    Having provided hundreds of jobs for women in my company over a period of 30 years, I was disappointed to read the comments from Sarah Bourne in last week’s Building.

  • Comment

    Let the market decide

    2005-04-15T00:00:00Z

    In your article “Housebuilders reject ODPM’s latest revision of PPG3” (24 March, page 20), you report on plans to give councils a say in what types of housing are built in their areas.

  • Comment

    Talking ‘bout my generation

    2005-04-15T00:00:00Z

    I read with dismay your article on on-site renewable energy with its premise that the building profession shouldn’t have to start thinking about renewable energy while there is still more to be done to make buildings more energy efficient.

  • Comment

    Take away the training levy

    2005-04-15T00:00:00Z

    I write in response to your news article “M&E trade bodies propose mandatory training levy” (18 March, page 17).

  • Comment

    Free advert

    2005-04-15T00:00:00Z

    The mobile workforce is on the increase in many organisations – whether it is a construction company with site workers, sales reps on the road or firefighters on call – and the message is clear: workers on the front line put the business at risk if they are not armed ...

  • Comment

    Moments of truth

    2005-04-08T00:00:00Z

    James Bessey’s comments on the Great Eastern Hotel vs Laing case (11 March, page 46) rightly remind us of the risk of an independent expert appearing to turn advocate.

  • Comment

    Scots miffed

    2005-04-08T00:00:00Z

    “You can't get that passionate about training” (24 March, Leader, page 3)? Really! Again I find myself having to state the Scottish position regarding apprenticeships and training within the construction industry. We are different - and those differences produce results, which indicate we are also successful.

  • Comment

    Survival first

    2005-04-08T00:00:00Z

    Holism seems to have become such an unholy grail in human behaviour that it was with some pleasure that I read David Bucknall’s “In for the duration” (18 March, page 37).

  • Comment

    A policy of caution

    2005-04-08T00:00:00Z

    A recent survey conducted by the Association of British Insurers will come as welcome news to those businesses that have been hit by the spiralling costs of obtaining professional indemnity cover.

  • Comment

    Blockbuster

    2005-04-08T00:00:00Z

    Hats off to English Partnerships. I was delighted to read your confirmation that the agency is opening up the £60,000 house competition to all methods of construction, including brick and block (18 March, page 22).

  • Comment

    Between JCT and reality

    2005-04-08T00:00:00Z

    Malcolm Taylor (24 March, Letters, page 34) supports the JCT provisions on practical completion and partial possession and disagrees with my comments on these clauses (“A hard way to earn £2”, 11 March, page 60).

  • Comment

    Violence is the answer

    2005-04-08T00:00:00Z

    The Safe Crackers debate (11 March, page 36) highlighted the difficulties of getting clients and designers to buy into and comply with their obligations under the CDM regulations.

  • Comment

    An anglocentricismophobe writes

    2005-04-08T00:00:00Z

    I recently took a little time out from tending my croft and drowning my sorrows after another Calcutta Cup defeat to read Building.