All Letters articles – Page 77

  • Comment

    The land of smiles and mass protest

    2006-03-17T00:00:00Z

    An extract from Building journalist Nick Jones' Bangkok blog …

  • Comment

    Pack it in

    2006-03-17T00:00:00Z

    I fully agree with David Brown's comments on the home information packs. Nick Raynsford's thinking, along with the government's in general, is flawed in respect of this legislation.

  • Comment

    Watch where you're pointing that

    2006-03-17T00:00:00Z

    Building's last "At your service" set of legal questions and answers (3 March) very helpfully summarised changes in the JCT98 standard form.

  • Comment

    Shhhhhhh!

    2006-03-17T00:00:00Z

    Here is our very own government ensuring that full health and safety regulations are being adhered to while works are being carried out on a secret government building in central London … This is one way to bring in some unwanted attention!

  • Comment

    Cheque, mate

    2006-03-10T00:00:00Z

    In February 2004 I had a £100 bet with Dennis Lenard, the then new chief executive of Constructing Excellence.

  • Comment

    CIBSE cleans up

    2006-03-10T00:00:00Z

    The article by Jennie Price "The climate has changed" (17 February, page 40) was a clarion call for building services professionals.

  • Comment

    Great minds, crap trousers

    2006-03-10T00:00:00Z

    Last week's provocative Building cover, featuring star architects Toyo Ito and Massimiliano Fuksas, posed an intriguing question.

  • Comment

    Delays and frustration

    2006-03-10T00:00:00Z

    I am disappointed that Nick Lane believes that the Society of Construction Law's delay and disruption protocol recommends one technique in all circumstances - time impact analysis (17 February).

  • Here’s a building that bulges out at the top, but the bulge contains nothing but fresh air. So what is the building?
    Comment

    In the detail

    2006-03-10T00:00:00Z

    Can you identify this building to win a bottle of Quinto do Vale D.Maria 1999 gold medal-winning port and a £25 drinks voucher, courtesy of door manufacturer Vicaima?

  • Comment

    Get ready for L

    2006-03-10T00:00:00Z

    Now the transitional arrangements for 2006 Part L have been confirmed by the ODPM, the industry is in a much better position to address how it adopts these regulations.

  • Comment

    New tricks

    2006-03-10T00:00:00Z

    You will no doubt receive countless letters on the subject of Wembley.

  • Comment

    Thai twiglets

    2006-03-10T00:00:00Z

    Our thanks to Mike Catterall of Adams Johns Kennard for this photo demonstrating precarious south-east Asian improvisation.

  • Comment

    Building meets Hello!

    2006-03-03T00:00:00Z

    I was disappointed to read your Valentines Day article about couples who met on site (10 February).

  • Comment

    A telling comparison

    2006-03-03T00:00:00Z

    The bottom line of an editorial in the Daily Telegraph on 4 February asserted that the Healh and Safety Executive should be closed down.

  • Comment

    The dangers of playing safe

    2006-03-03T00:00:00Z

    Your industry debate on off-site manufacturing (17 February) appears to miss a key member of the team in the delivery of any off-site solution.

  • Comment

    Defending the estate

    2006-03-03T00:00:00Z

    I would like to compliment you on the article entitled "No more messing about in boats" (17 February), which I found most entertaining.

  • Amber Fort near Jaipur in India last year.
    Comment

    Dynamic tension …

    2006-03-03T00:00:00Z

    Our thanks to Martin Thorp of Thorp Consultancy in Edenbridge, Kent, for this photo, taken at the Amber Fort near Jaipur in India last year.

  • Comment

    Name and shame

    2006-03-03T00:00:00Z

    I can understand why you elicit pictures from the readership on safety blunders. The humour makes light reading. Sadly these real-life events often go unreported - at great cost to workers and their families.

  • Comment

    A plan submitted

    2006-03-03T00:00:00Z

    There seems to be much debate and difference of opinion about how to claw back excess profits as a result of granting planning permission (17 February). Is a strategy based on the following a possibility?

  • Comment

    Un point

    2006-03-03T00:00:00Z

    Following on from your piece on the Europan housing design competition (17 February), I thought you'd be interested to hear from us as we have direct experience of the whole "Eurovision" effect.