All Legal articles – Page 175

  • Comment

    Wriggle room

    2005-07-01T00:00:00Z

    A developer tried three arguments to get round an adjudicator’s order to pay its contractor £170k. This is what the court said about them

  • Comment

    Check it out

    2005-06-24T00:00:00Z

    The revamped JCT suite of contracts has finally begun to arrive. So what’s changed, what’s stayed the same – and what do you have to look out for?

  • Tony Bingham
    Comment

    The big squeeze

    2005-06-24T00:00:00Z

    When the Bechtel boss told his people to do everything they could to disallow contractors’ costs, the contractors went to court. But was this the right move?

  • Comment

    Ideal for multiple injuries

    2005-06-17T00:00:00Z

    It’s hard to introduce a new defence in the middle of a trial, but in adjudication – being a quick first-aid for two parties in a punch-up – it’s the very opposite

  • Comment

    It’s down to the developer

    2005-06-10T00:00:00Z

    A half-baked rethink of the law is unlikely to increase project safety. Placing the burden of responsibility at clients’ doorsteps is a much more effective solution

  • Comment

    Worse than useless

    2005-06-03T00:00:00Z

    The BPF’s consultancy agreement is a fine example of a one-sided contract that dumps extra work and unlimited risk on any consultant foolish enough to sign it

  • John Riches
    Comment

    Fun, frolics and forms

    2005-06-03T00:00:00Z

    The JCT has revamped and extended its range of standard contracts. If you can get past the swanky yellow covers, you’ll find all kinds of interesting changes inside

  • Bang out of order
    Comment

    Bang out of order

    2005-06-03T00:00:00Z

    When a dodgy builder was jailed for fleecing customers, he got an ASBO into the bargain. What the dastardly felon also got was a dose of rough justice

  • Ann Minogue
    Comment

    You know it makes sense

    2005-05-27T00:00:00Z

    The British Property Federation has produced one short, simple and fair consultancy agreement for every profession. What do you think its reception will be?

  • News

    Clients and consultants go to war over project liability

    2005-05-27T00:00:00Z

    Gulf between two has been exposed by publication of contract drawn up by the British Property Federation

  • Comment

    Too much to ask for?

    2005-05-27T00:00:00Z

    Be warned: there’s an extremely architect-friendly clause hidden in RIBA SFA/99. So friendly, and so hidden, that it has been ruled ‘unusual and onerous’

  • Rudi Klein
    Comment

    Push!

    2005-05-13T00:00:00Z

    The Construction Act needs more radical reforms than are being considered in the present consultation document. Here’s what we should be lobbying for

  • Comment

    Welcome to castle Bolkestein

    2005-05-06T00:00:00Z

    The proposed European Union services directive, or Bolkestein’s monster, as it’s known, could produce a playing field with so many bumps that standards suffer

  • Comment

    CDM: An audit

    2005-05-06T00:00:00Z

    The Health and Safety Executive has just recommended changes to the CDM regulations. So the first question we should ask is: will they do any good?

  • Comment

    An old battleground

    2005-04-29T00:00:00Z

    The hardy perennial of liquidated damages popped up again in a recent court action, which turned on whether the clause was a penalty, and unenforceable, or not

  • Comment

    How do you work this thing?

    2005-04-15T00:00:00Z

    In theory, the Information and Consultation Regulations mean firms face fines of up to £75k if they fail to consult staff – but what will it mean in practice?

  • News

    The bill has arrived

    2005-04-15T00:00:00Z

    While you were busy preparing for your Easter break, the government finally launched its corporate manslaughter legislation – but will it make us any safer?

  • Rudi Klein
    Comment

    Show me the money

    2005-04-08T00:00:00Z

    We kick off this Construction Act review special by asking why the DTI’s consultation document does not properly address subcontractors’ right to get hold of their cash

  • Comment

    What the review missed

    2005-04-08T00:00:00Z

    Concerns about the statutory payment and adjudication provisions in the Construction Act are well founded, but the review fails to deal with all of them head on

  • John Redmond
    Comment

    When less isn’t more

    2005-04-08T00:00:00Z

    When it comes to reforming the Construction Act, the instinct to resist meddling is correct in many cases, but has done nothing to address a major failing