B v Southwark LBC
B was a teenager serving a short sentence at a young offenders' institution. He qualified for early release under the home curfew ("tagging") scheme – if he had adequate accommodation to go to.

He had no such accommodation, so he applied to Southwark council in south London as a homeless person.

The council decided that because he had accommodation in the prison, he was not "homeless" and would not become homeless until released.

A High Court judge granted a declaration that B was homeless. Prison accommodation simply did not count for the purposes of the definition of "homelessness". A prisoner had no tenancy, licence or other "right" to occupy his cell. Even if that was wrong, a cell could not be accommodation "reasonable to continue to occupy" when a prisoner was faced with the opportunity of early release. B was accordingly homeless and, given that the council accepted he had priority need, accommodation should have been provided.