- News
All the latest updates on building safety reformRegulations latest
- Focus
- Comment
- Programmes
- CPD
- Building the Future
- Jobs
- Data
- Subscribe
- Events
2024 events calendar
Explore nowBuilding Awards
Keep up to date
- Building Boardroom
All the latest updates on building safety reform
2024 events calendar
Explore nowBuilding Awards
Keep up to dateBy Ted Lowery2019-09-12T05:00:00
Ted Lowery considers an unsuccessful call on a personal guarantee
On 9 December 2013 Mr Martin provided a personal guarantee to McLaren whereby he undertook to discharge to McLaren his own liabilities together with the liabilities of three companies in which he had a controlling interest. Clause 1 of the guarantee provided that if any of the companies failed to pay an amount when due, Mr Martin would immediately on demand pay the relevant amount as if he were the principal obligor.
Clause 9.1 required that every notice or demand under the guarantee was to be in writing and delivered personally by first-class post or fax to the addresses or fax numbers appearing on the signature pages of the guarantee. Clause 9.2 concerned the timing of service of any demand or notice, which would be immediately if delivered personally or by fax or on the first working day following the day on which it was posted.
Read more…
Existing subscriber? LOGIN
Stay at the forefront of thought leadership with news and analysis from award-winning journalists. Enjoy company features, CEO interviews, architectural reviews, technical project know-how and the latest innovations.
Get your free guest access SIGN UP TODAY
Subscribe to Building today and you will benefit from:
View our subscription options and join our community