Legal: What happens when an architect changes your design without telling you

Steven carey bw 2017

Steven Carey reviews a recent case about an architect found negligent for changing a design without the clients’ consent

The recent case of Freeborn vs Marcal provides guidance on the standard of care required of architects. Mr Marcal was commissioned to act as architect and project manager for works to the claimants’ luxury home, including the construction of a “glass box on legs” cinema room and staircase in their pool house – a case therefore forged out of austerity Britain.

The claimants complained the final design had evolved from “sleek modern to wonky industrial” without their approval. Their claim included the costs incurred in constructing this cinema box.

Already registered? Login here

To continue enjoying Building.co.uk, sign up for free guest access

Existing subscriber? LOGIN

 

Stay at the forefront of thought leadership with news and analysis from award-winning journalists. Enjoy company features, CEO interviews, architectural reviews, technical project know-how and the latest innovations.

  • Limited access to building.co.uk
  • Breaking industry news as it happens
  • Breaking, daily and weekly e-newsletters

Get your free guest access  SIGN UP TODAY

Gated access promo

Subscribe now for unlimited access

 

Subscribe to Building today and you will benefit from:

  • Unlimited access to all stories including expert analysis and comment from industry leaders
  • Our league tables, cost models and economics data
  • Our online archive of over 10,000 articles
  • Building magazine digital editions
  • Building magazine print editions
  • Printed/digital supplements

Subscribe now for unlimited access.

View our subscription options and join our community