- News
All the latest updates on building safety reformRegulations latest
- Focus
- Comment
- Programmes
- CPD
- Building the Future
- Jobs
- Data
- Subscribe
- Events
2024 events calendar
Explore nowBuilding Awards
Keep up to date
- Building Boardroom
Ted Lowery on the impact of an arbitration clause upon a Part 8 application
Maelor Foods Ltd vs Rawlings Consulting (UK) Ltd [2018] EWHC 1878 (QB)
Before His Honour Judge Eyre QC
High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts in Manchester Technology and Construction Court
Judgment delivered 6 July 2018
Under a contract dated August 2016 Maelor engaged Rawlings to carry out works at a processing plant in Wrexham. The contract was based upon the 2011 JCT standard form.
Article 7 in the contract provided for adjudication. Article 8 provided that any dispute or difference of any kind, except for disputes or differences in connection with the enforcement of a decision of an adjudicator, was to be referred to arbitration.
Following a dispute over the validity of an interim payment notice dated 17 April 2018, Rawlings commenced adjudication. Maelor challenged the adjudicator’s jurisdiction on grounds that the interim payment notice included sums payable in connection with other exchanges between the parties occurring before and after August 2016 that did not form part of the contract. Maelor also contended that the interim payment notice was invalid having been preceded by an interim payment application that Rawlings acknowledged was non-compliant with the contract.
…
Existing subscriber? LOGIN
Stay at the forefront of thought leadership with news and analysis from award-winning journalists. Enjoy company features, CEO interviews, architectural reviews, technical project know-how and the latest innovations.
Get your free guest access SIGN UP TODAY
Subscribe to Building today and you will benefit from:
View our subscription options and join our community