- News
All the latest updates on building safety reformRegulations latest
- Focus
- Comment
- Programmes
- CPD
- Building the Future
- Jobs
- Data
- Subscribe
- Events
2024 events calendar
Explore nowBuilding Awards
Keep up to date
- Building Boardroom
All the latest updates on building safety reform
2024 events calendar
Explore nowBuilding Awards
Keep up to dateBuilding intelligence - systems integration/cost savings matrix | ||
Potential saving elements | (on a scale of one to 101) | |
1 | Reduce complexity by discounting sub-system features and functions that do not provide major benefits to the client. | 7 |
2 | Exploit opportunities to piggy back data onto other systems, instead of stand-alone cables/networks. | 5 |
3 | Insist on supply-and-maintain contracts for plant, with some simple incentives/penalties for downtime. This will lead to simpler equipment installations and reduced capital cost. | 5 |
4 | Provide ample RJ45 sockets in plant rooms, above ceilings etc, as part of structured cabling, rather than have the designer spending time on specific locations, routes and containment. | 3 |
5 | Make maximum use of a common IP network for all communications, thus avoiding multiple network cables. Avoid ELV systems (those transmitting 0-10 V and 4-20 mA etc) over dedicated bus cables. | 5 |
6 | Co-ordinate the location of panels that need to communicate, thereby reducing riser space and containment. | 4 |
7 | Critically analyse, from the user perspective, the number of points that need to be monitored. Monitor the plant itself rather than through a bems. Purchase IP compatible systems where possible. | 8 |
8 | Have sub-systems factory tested including controls, to reduce on-site commissioning costs. | 2 |
9 | Ensure that containment is properly utilised, to avoid having just one or two cables on several dedicated trays. | 5 |
1 10 = Lowest fruit, ie maximum gains for effort/investment |