The Government’s reorganisation of modern apprenticeships will expand schemes to over 25s and establish young apprenticeships for school-goers and has been cautiously welcomed by industry.
Proposals to revamp the organisation of apprenticeships, including scrapping the age cap of 25 on the former Modern Apprenticeships and a scheme for 14-16 year-olds, have been cautiously welcomed by the ECA and SummitSkills.

SummitSkills will, however, seek assistance from the LSC and Government in addressing health and safety issues relating to young people working on site. And, the ECA warns that expanding the scheme to over-25s must involve real investment and not be at the expense of existing funding.

The concept of adult apprenticeships stems from the 2003 White Paper 21st Century Skills, which outlined funding for Levels 2 and 3 NVQ modern apprenticeships starting up to the age of 25, rather than being completed by 25. This funding will now be extended to those over 25.

The Government plans to run pilot schemes in a number of sectors, the first of which is expected to be the rail industry. “While we welcome the proposals to allow those over the age of 25 to undertake apprenticeships, it should not be at the expense of existing schemes,” said ECA director David Pollock. “New funding will have to be made available to provide more opportunities for this age group.

“It should be noted that, for several years, the electrotechnical sector has offered adult apprenticeships, however new government funding would be appreciated.”

Keith Marshall, chief executive of SummitSkills, said: “The entire apprenticeship programme depends upon the co-operation of employers within the sector. The Government’s advertising campaign aimed at employers to help engage and encourage them to take on apprentices will help but a key issue is to establish the Government’s stance on funding in order to make this come to fruition. This is particularly relevant with regard to adult apprenticeships where SummitSkills will look for funding to reflect the overall cost.”