Should you be promoting ten Gigabit/s copper structured cabling to your clients, or is there another, better method? Rosemary McGlashon explains the intricacies of today's market.
Increasingly, ten Gigabit/s Ethernet over twisted-pair copper cabling is taking a centre stage role. Customers are beginning to request this form of structured cabling, which extends the capabilities far in excess of any previous copper cabling formats.
However, the standards surrounding ten Gb/s Ethernet have yet to be ratified (see box, ‘Setting the standards') and it is true to say that the market is still at an early stage. For today's contractors and installers, the situation is becoming confusing: do they stick with standard Category 5e and 6 horizontal cabling systems, with a fibre backbone; do they start to offer ten Gb/s Ethernet; or make the switch to fibre-to-the-desk?
History in the making
There has been an IEEE standard for ten Gb/s Ethernet since 2003, specifically over optical fibre. It has been successful in the wide area network environment, but has not penetrated much into the enterprise network. This is largely because the bulk of higher data rate applications use fibre channel (FC) protocol, rather than Ethernet.
Also, ten Gb/s Ethernet over standard 62·5/125 fibre will only perform over cable runs of 35 m; although there are plans to extend this capability.
So, attention turned to delivering ten Gb/s Ethernet over twisted-pair copper cabling (10GBASE-T). The single biggest advantage is the reduction in cost. The expectation is that the active equipment for the copper links will be about half the price of that for fibre links when the standard is launched.
The main focus of 10GBASE-T is storage and server applications. It is also potentially suitable for backbone network applications.
Another standard - 10GBASE-CX4 - came out in 2004. This is designed to be a lower-cost alternative to optical fibre for rack-to-rack links, switch clustering and some data centre applications. It can only support up to 15 m lengths of cable, so application is limited.
Aside from the fact that the standards are not finalised, there are other issues to consider. With 10GBASE-T, copper will be running closer to its physical limit than ever before, which is likely to make a system more difficult to install and maintain. The bend radius will be highly challenged. The cable is also likely to be heavier and more expensive than standard copper cabling. Until the standards are issued and components can be fully qualified, interoperability between manufacturers cannot be guaranteed.
However, the biggest issue is probably alien crosstalk (AXT), namely signal coupling from one channel to another. In 10GBASE-T, the signal will be carried equally over the copper pairs, with each pair supporting transmission in both directions.
Since the loss of the cable rises steeply with frequency, the signal to noise ratio (SNR) must be kept as low as possible. Although the standards bodies are looking at how they can address AXT, there are still unknown factors about this complex topic. And despite extensive modelling, as yet there is no finalised method of measurement.
Noise reduction
Cables are traditionally bundled closely together, meaning that the noise from one can couple into others. This has been a problem in the past, but it has been manageable. However, due to the sensitivity of 10GBASE-T it can no longer be ignored.
One answer is to space cables out, rather than bundling them in neat parallel lines; another is to separate channels altogether. This does create some potential issues: the installer and user must understand the system and maintain it in the ‘as installed' state. Also, the cabling will take up far more space.
These complicated mitigation techniques can be avoided by using fully shielded cables, jacks and patchleads that are compliant with the new standard. This should allow up to 100 m channels to be installed without the use of mitigation techniques for AXT.
Another alternative is to make the move to fibre optic cabling. It may be relatively expensive, but it is light, small in size and immune to EMI and RFI. Further, prices could drop in the future.
Looking at the bigger picture, it is important to ask whether customers really need ten Gb/s Ethernet yet. After all, most users have only recently starting using 10-100 Mb/s and 1 Gb/s represents a small percentage of installations today.
Yet it would be dangerous to take a Luddite's view of progress in this area. As has been seen in the past few years, data bandwidth demand has grown far in excess of most people's expectations and early adopters already want to be ready for 10 Gb/s. It is important for contractors and installers to be aware of all the facts surrounding 10GBASE-T before they make any decisions.
Setting the standards
The cabling for 10GBASE-T is approximately six months away from being standardised. From a technical point of view, the standards are fairly stable. However, it does not pay to be complacent – a lot can happen between the draft stage and final ratification. Furthermore, the ISO 11801 standard will not be specifying components for 10GBASE-T until 2007.
Manufacturers who promise compliance based on draft standards are playing on dangerous ground. Warranties based on these run the risk of being invalid in the future.
Available standards
The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) 802.3 committee is the governing body behind defining the application requirements of 10GBASE-T. The current expectation is that the standard will be published around July 2006 and will be called IEEE 802.3an.
This standard will be based on supporting four-pair copper cabling, with links of at least 100 m of four-pair Class F balanced copper cabling and at least 55-100 m on four-pair Class E (Category 6) balanced copper cabling. The chosen connector is the RJ-45, thereby excluding all proprietary connector formats.
Two standards bodies, TIA/EIA and ISO/IEC, are currently working on cabling for 10GBASE-T. Both are creating cabling standards that give the parameters required for 10GBASE-T transmission.
For TIA/EIA, the standard is called TIA/EIA-586-B.2-10. For ISO/IEC, a draft amendment to ISO 11801 (called ISO/IEC AM1.1 to ISO11801: 2002) has been proposed.
It is likely that these two standards will eventually contain different parameters since they are based on slightly different cabling system philosophies. ISO/IEC has left categories 6 and 7 in the standard but has created two new categories: category 6A and 7A. Category 6A is specified to 500 MHz and Category 7A to 1000 MHz.
User guides
The two standards bodies are also creating ‘reports’ or ‘bulletins’ that guide the user on the assessment (and mitigation if required) of installed cabling.
The TIA/EIA document is called TSB-155; the ISO/IEC document is ISO/IEC 24750. The latter document contains helpful advice on the requalification of Category 6 cabling to run 10GBASE-T. This involves testing to new limits at a higher frequency and including extensive recommendations on alien crosstalk mitigation.
All of these standards are likely to be issued in 2006, although the final version of ISO 11801, including the component specifications, is not due to be published until 2007.
Source
Electrical and Mechanical Contractor
Postscript
Rosemary McGlashon is European technical manager, Telecom Enterprise department, 3M UK.
No comments yet